“To me, that’s a real good start,” said Russell Kokubun, director of the Hawaii Department of Agriculture (HDOA). “It’s good to have it protected in perpetuity.”
Landowners were motivated in part by a legislative incentive package, which includes tax credits for constructing Ag-related infrastructure. Incentives also include the right to develop farm dwellings and employee housing on the land, loan guarantees and the ability to petition the state to reclassify up to 15 percent of the IAL acreage into a rural, urban or conservation district.
But landowners are also aware that up to 50 percent of their holdings could be deemed IAL, so it’s in their best interest to select the acreage themselves, rather than wait for the counties and state Land Use Commission (LUC), which has the final say, to make the call.
Jerry Ornellas Photo by Joan Conrow
“They know this IAL is going to come out of their hides, so let’s see how much political pressure they bring to bear,” said Jerry Ornellas, a fruit farmer who serves on the state Board of Agriculture and the IAL citizens advisory committee for Kauai. “I hope our recommendations don’t get watered down too much.”
The
Kauai committee, assisted by Dr. Karl Kim, an
urban planning professor at the University of Hawaii,
used criteria developed by state legislators to score each tax map
parcel on the island for its agricultural vote.
At
a meeting held to discuss the committee's draft report, Mike
Dyer, a Kauai real estate agent, expressed concern that he and other
ag land owners are “going to lose some rights for incentives that
are pretty feeble. In my guts, I have the feeling that it’s not
going to be very positive.”
But
Ornellas said the committee did not recommend small property owners
for the IAL process, unless they have speciality lands, such as taro
loi.
On
Kauai, only Grove Farm and Alexander & Baldwin have voluntarily
designated acreage as IAL. County planning director Michael Dahilig
said the county likely
would have to develop some incentives of its own to bring other
landowners into the fold.
Ornellas
is also concerned that some landowners seem to think that once
they've designated some acreage as IAL, the rest of their holdings
are open for development. That's an important consideration, since 47
percent of the 4.1 million acres that comprise the Hawaiian Islands
is currently in the agricultural district.
“I
keep reiterating the mantra has to be, nothing changes,” Ornellas
said. “This is not going to be the third mahele, the mahele for the
developers. But some of the large landowners, they just explode when
you tell them that.”
He
has an ally in Kokubun, who said, “The idea is not to dismiss those
other ag lands that aren't designated as IAL for any reason. They
will remain in ag and we still need to maintain our land use policies
in regard to that.”
Still,
as Peter Young, the former director of the state Department of Land
and Natural Resources, noted in a recent Facebook post, “[I]nitial
mapping used broad-brush strokes and in many places lava flows and
other non-productive real estate was categorized as 'agricultural'
(almost like a ‘catch-all’ category.) More needs to be done to
identify truly-farmable land to be placed in the broad category of
'agricultural.'”
Kokubun
agrees that some ag lands are likely better suited for the
conservation and urban districts. But he thinks the best venue for
that discussion is the Office of State Planning's boundary review
process.
Although
OSP is mandated to conduct a review every five years, it's been 20
years since the last one was done. Kokubun said. The Hawaii Economic
Development Task Force has recommended using monies from the barrel
tax to fund a new review.
Ornellas
also expressed frustration that the IAL process seems unlikely to
result in any significant land reform, in terms of breaking up the
large holdings that date back more than a century in Hawaii.
On
Kauai, for example, just five owners control some 110,000 of the
136,980 acres designated as agriculture. “That tells the real story
of where we're at, this third world scenario of a few wealthy
landowners controlling all the land,” Ornellas said. “It may be
in IAL, but then they just lease it on their terms. Farmers need
security, and that's why they need private ownership.”
But
according to Kokubun, “The law was not intended as a means to
redistribute lands owned by private landowners, but to protect those
lands to primarily that are irrigated.” Once land is designed IAL,
it takes a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to change it.
“What
also needs to happen, and I'm exploring that, is that certain state
lands could be petitioned to be designated as IAL and we could
provide parcels to smaller farmers,” Kokubun says. “That's really
the role of the state.”
Such
an effort would require DOA, DLNR and the Department of Hawaiian
Lands to cooperate, as all three entities have jurisdiction over
agricultural lands, and Kokubun said he's hopeful it can be
accomplished. “The community is very supportive of becoming more
self-sufficient so it's a good time to move ag forward.”
First published Honolulu Weekly Feb. 15, 2012