The
extra time also would allow the county to continue meeting with the
state, which currently has authority over health and safety issues
related to pesticides. But due to insufficient funding, state
monitoring, inspection and enforcement actions have lagged.
Carvalho
said he met yesterday with Russell Kokubun, director of the state
Department of Agriculture, and key members of the governor's cabinet.
“They are committed to working with our county on a menu of
opportunities,” the mayor said, and “when we come up with things
we really need, the support will be there.”
The
Council recessed its hearing until 9 a.m., Tuesday, Oct. 15 without
taking action today.
Managing
Director Gary Heu told the Council the county would need to hire
consultants and inspectors and conduct additional staff training in
order to implement the law, which takes effect within six months of
passage. Rules must also be drafted and vetted by the public and
Small Business Board of Review, a process that could take nine months
to a year.
“We
don't have the manpower to take on new complex management tasks,”
Heu said, estimating it would require a minimum of two fulltime
employees, several consultants and possibly additional staff in the
prosecutor's office to implement and enforce the bill. The
anticipated cost would be about $1.479 million the first year.
Councilman
Gary Hooser, a co-sponsor of the bill, noted that a two-month
deferral would move the issue into the start of the legislative
session and an election year — a timing scenario he'd hoped to
avoid when introducing the bill earlier this year.
Hooser
dismissed concerns about the difficulties of implementing and
enforcing the bill, saying, “I'm trying to think about what's so
complex.” He also noted that “it's not uncommon for laws to be
adopted without rule-making in place.”
Councilman
Tim Bynum, the other co-sponsor, also downplayed enforcement issues,
noting that the chemical/seed companies “would have to doctor their
own records to violate these laws. These are business people. They
aren't going to do that.”
However,
the Abuse Chronicles investigation revealed that Kauai real estate
companies did doctor their reservation records to help property
owners obtain vacation rental (TVR) permits. Additionally, rules
required under the 2009 TVR ordinance were never even drafted, much
less adopted.
Heu
said he thought rules for 2491 need to be in place quickly because “I
think there would be strong calls for action the minute it is
approved.” The county also anticipates fielding significant
complaints once the bill is passed, he said, "and possibly some complaints that don't deserve
our serious attention." He urged the Council to add guidelines for the public in making complaints and penalties for frivolous complaints. He also asked for an amendment to allow the DOA to participate in inspection and
enforcement.
The
Council also needs to clarify its legislative intent, Heu said. “Is
it the vision of this body that [enforcement] is complaint-based, or proactive on
the part of the Administration? What would trigger inspection is very
unclear.”
Councilwoman
Nadine Nakamura said that given the timing of the county budget and lengthy Civil Service hiring processes, “under a best case scenario, you can begin
enforcement in April 2015.” She followed up by saying, “There
might be some snickering in the crowd, but I'm just speaking
realistically.”
The
bill includes buffer zones and disclosure primarily because citizens
are concerned about “pesticide laden dust and the spray drift,”
said Councilman Ross Kagawa. “Whose gonna do that segment? Will
Department of Health do that, or county personnel, to determine if
homes are being affected? It's the state's responsibility. They have
the medical experts...to determine health effects. Are we working
with the state DOH as well?”
“We
have to pull everybody who's responsible to the table and hold
everybody accountable, without pointing fingers,” Carvalho said,
noting he's been trying to balance the concerns of people who are
“emotionally challenged and afraid, and on the other side, working
with the business part of it.”
“I
think what's lacking is a sense of urgency,” Hooser said. “This
is urgent. We have physicians who are delivering babies who believe
there are more birth defects than in other parts of the community.”
Added
Bynum: “Many would say the time for dialog is past. We need some
action first and then we can have some dialogue.”
“I'm
telling you, relationships are important in this,” Carvalho said.
“I truly believe we have an opportunity to talk this thing
through.”
After
Maui state health officer Dr. Lorrin Pang spoke, though not in his
official capacity, Nakamura asked why the state hadn't declared a
critical health situation if people are being sickened by pesticides.
"We
can't act without seeing harm,” Pang replied.
“So
why should the county?” Nakamura countered.
“Because
you guys can act precautiously,” Pang said.
Several pro-2491 speakers, including Andrea Brower, pooh-poohed the mayor's estimates on time and cost, saying there's no reason why the bill couldn't be quickly implemented and the corporations should have to pay. Another woman said she didn't think there would be any complaints, so it
wouldn't be necessary to have staff to respond.
The Babes Against Biotech chick, who flew in from Oahu, angrily
threatened to mobilize voters against anyone who voted for a
deferral.
Carl Berg, a marine biologist, urged the Council to impose 500-foot spraying buffers from the shoreline, saying that is the nursery area for fish and other marine species. A 250-foot buffer is needed from streams and inland waterways, he said.
Carl Berg, a marine biologist, urged the Council to impose 500-foot spraying buffers from the shoreline, saying that is the nursery area for fish and other marine species. A 250-foot buffer is needed from streams and inland waterways, he said.
Other
speakers, some of whom camped overnight to ensure a seat in Council
chambers, claimed the bill had not caused any divisiveness on the
island.
But
Kauai Farm Bureau President Jerry Ornellas disagreed, saying he gets
calls every week from small farmers who are being harassed for
spraying. Others are concerned about how the bill will impact their
operations and the future of ag on Kauai.
“It's
divided our community deeply,” he said, noting the Kauai Farm
Bureau was never consulted before 2491 was introduced. “I don't
know who was.”
Ornellas
said a better bill could have been crafted, and much of the rancor
avoided, “if we'd approached this issue in the spirit of
cooperation instead of confrontation. You don't have to start a civil
war to get your point across.”
Comments accepted at Kauai Eclectic.
Comments accepted at Kauai Eclectic.